10% off your first year of annual Pro with code EXPECT10 until November 12. See pricing

Free tool

Risk-Reward Ratio Calculator

Work out the RR ratio of a trade from your entry, stop and target, what fees do to it, and the win rate it needs to pay.

By Reid KashUpdated How we calculate

The risk-reward ratio (RR ratio) compares what a trade can lose, from entry to stop, with what it can make, from entry to target. Risking 10 points to make 25 is a risk to reward ratio of 1:2.5. Enter your levels below; pick a contract and add your costs to see the ratio in dollars and after fees.

Your trade

Below entry for a long, above it for a short.

Commission plus exchange and clearing fees, in and out. Leave blank to ignore costs.

Your historical win rate for this setup, to see whether the ratio pays.

Risk-reward ratio

Risk : reward (long trade)

1 : 2.00

Risk, entry to stop

10 points (40 ticks) = $100.00

Reward, entry to target

20 points (80 ticks) = $200.00

Net risk : reward after $3.00 costs

1 : 1.91

Win rate needed to break even

34.3%

Expectancy per trade at a 40% win rate

$17.00

At this win rate the ratio pays on average, if trades really run to the target or the stop.

How to calculate the risk to reward ratio

Risk = |Entry − Stop| · Reward = |Target − Entry| · RR ratio = Reward ÷ Risk

Take an ES long at 5600 with a stop at 5590 and a target at 5625. Risk is 10 points and reward is 25 points, so the ratio is 1:2.5. In dollars, at $50 a point, that is $500 risked to make $1,250 per contract. The ratio doesn't change with size: two contracts double both sides. The position size calculator sets the size; this page checks whether the trade is worth taking at all.

Why RR ratio means nothing without win rate

A 1:3 trade sounds better than a 1:1 trade, but the ratio only tells you the payout. Whether that payout makes money depends on how often you get it. Every trade below runs to its target or its stop, and the result is in R, multiples of what you risked:

Expectancy (R) = Win rate × RR ratio − (1 − Win rate)

Expected result per trade in R by win rate and risk-reward ratio
Win rate1:11:1.51:21:3
30%−0.40R−0.25R−0.10R+0.20R
40%−0.20R0.00R+0.20R+0.60R
50%0.00R+0.25R+0.50R+1.00R
60%+0.20R+0.50R+0.80R+1.40R

At a 30% win rate, 1:2 loses 0.10R per trade and 1:3 makes +0.20R. At 60%, even 1:1 makes +0.20R. So check whether your win rate is above the break-even rate for your ratio. The win rate calculator answers that from your trade counts, including whether the sample is big enough to trust, and the expectancy calculator does the same sum in dollars from your average win and loss.

Fees lower your real risk-reward

Costs come off every winner and add to every loser, so the ratio after fees is always worse than the one on the chart. The smaller the stop, the bigger the hit. An MES scalp with a 2-point stop and a 4-point target is 1:2 on the chart: $10.00 risked for $20.00. With $1.50 of round-trip costs it becomes $18.50 ÷ $11.50 = 1:1.61, and the break-even win rate rises from 33.3% to 38.3%. Exchange, clearing and NFA fees alone are $1.12 a round trip on MES, before any broker commission. On a 20-point stop the same costs barely register.

Planned risk-reward vs the ratio you actually get

Closing winners early and moving stops further away both shrink the ratio you planned, and neither shows up on a single trade. Log the planned ratio on your trades in ExpectancyIQ and the risk report sets it against the R you actually got, as RR efficiency (actual ÷ plan), once enough trades carry a plan. The trading dashboard shows win rate and expectancy from the same imported trades, calculated as described on the methodology page. More free tools are on the futures calculators page. This page is educational, not financial advice.

Risk-reward ratio questions

What is a good risk-reward ratio?

There is no single good number, because the ratio only pays together with a win rate. At 1:1 you need to win more than 50% of trades; at 1:2, more than 33.3%; at 1:3, more than 25%. A 1:3 target that you hit 20% of the time loses money (−0.20R per trade), while a 1:1 trade won 60% of the time makes +0.20R.

Is a 1:2 risk-reward the same as 2:1?

Usually, yes. Traders write the ratio both ways. 1:2 read as risk to reward and 2:1 read as reward to risk both describe risking $1 to make $2. This calculator shows risk first (1 : 2.00). If someone quotes a ratio without saying which comes first, the bigger number is almost always the reward.

How do you calculate the risk-reward ratio for a short trade?

The same way, with the sides flipped: the stop sits above entry and the target below. A short from 5600 with a stop at 5606 and a target at 5588 risks 6 points to make 12, a ratio of 1:2. The calculator reads the direction from which side the target is on.

Does a higher RR ratio always mean a better trade?

No. A farther target gets hit less often, so pushing the ratio up usually pulls the win rate down. What matters is expectancy: win rate × reward minus loss rate × risk. Compare setups on that, using the win rate you have actually recorded for each one.